|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jul 25, 2009 2:05:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Torii-Lee on Jul 25, 2009 12:59:59 GMT -5
I think it's the right thing to do for 2 reasons. 1) Those animals are suffering while alive. 2) PETA cannot possible find homes for all those animals (especially the very sick ones)!
|
|
|
Post by hello on Aug 7, 2009 1:52:06 GMT -5
i hate seeing creulty pics and vids. so i didn't see it. but they are hypocrites.. just saying
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Aug 7, 2009 2:25:44 GMT -5
I'll copy and paste what the blog says, then.
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Aug 7, 2009 2:26:48 GMT -5
NOTE: I do not completely agree with this and also am unsure if all of what it says is 100% true.
|
|
kcares
Animal Rights Supporter
I Will Be Meat-Free--End of Story
Posts: 99
|
Post by kcares on Aug 7, 2009 8:45:28 GMT -5
I'm pretty much choosing to ignore this, mainly because it would completly turn me off from all the good things PETA does.
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Aug 7, 2009 20:02:13 GMT -5
^I agree with you.
|
|
|
Post by streamofpassion on Aug 11, 2009 16:15:39 GMT -5
euthanasia.. "good death"
I'm all for the mercy killing form of euthanasia. when a living creature is so far into the point of no return that it's constant suffering outweighs any little speck of brightness that can insert itself into that creature's day, there is no better option than the end that creature's pain. when it's the choice of a painless injection vs. an agonizing death, i am in full support of euthanasia.
however, it is when an animal that is completely adoptable is killed for insignificant reasons (such as the animal being of a specific breed, having lived in a cage for an extended period of time, having minor but very treatable injuries, is old, or because the money that could have been used to shelter and care for the animal was spent on publicity) that euthanasia is unacceptable. there is no justification for the killing of an animal who has the potential to live a full and happy life.
there is nothing good about the death of a completely adoptable animal, killed before his/her time. this form of euthanasia is not mercy killing but murder. there is no justification for that.
|
|
Linn
Freedom Fighter
Little old lady got mutilated late last night, werewolves of London again.
Posts: 672
|
Post by Linn on Aug 11, 2009 19:34:59 GMT -5
I think that people should regard euthanasia with a "quality VS quantity" view.
If there's a possibility that the animal is able to life a full and happy life, then give it the chance to. There's absolutely no excuses. So the dog isn't dog-friendly? Find a responsible owner, or train it. So it used to be a fighting dog? Same thing. So it's a pit bull? My pittie is the sweetest, gentlest dog I know!
But if you'd have to sacrifice its quality of life to extend it, then put it down. And be nice about it! Pet it and tell it that it's a good dog/cat/etc and that kinda thing. Do it like the vet does it, with the catheter and all that.
|
|
GYARADOS.
Animal Rights Activist
eat like you give a damn!
Posts: 401
|
Post by GYARADOS. on Aug 12, 2009 22:34:03 GMT -5
i agree, i mean what else are they supposed to do? not to mention all the good peta has done for animals, and all the serious issues they have brought to light, why stop supporting them just because they're forced to do the deed that shelters do just as frequently. i mean euthanasia is terrible, so are all the other things peta is fighting against. for me the pros by far out way the cons.
|
|
|
Post by streamofpassion on Aug 13, 2009 15:23:55 GMT -5
i agree, i mean what else are they supposed to do? not to mention all the good peta has done for animals, and all the serious issues they have brought to light, why stop supporting them just because they're forced to do the deed that shelters do just as frequently. i mean euthanasia is terrible, so are all the other things peta is fighting against. for me the pros by far out way the cons. Peta euthanizes an insanely huge amount of the animals that they take in. Many, if not most, of these animals are completely adoptable with full potential to live out a healthy and happy life- as long as they're not killed before their time.
The fact is that peta is not "forced" to kill such large amounts of adoptable animals, they choose to, in favor of spending their money on ridiculous campaigns instead of actually caring for and rehoming the animals.
I guess other people can turn a blind eye to peta's enormous role in the abhorrent 'deed' of pointless euthanasia, however I will not stand for that. I don't care what or how many other worthwhile causes they have, I simply cannot support a hypocritical organization that kills obscene amounts of adoptable animals.
Doing otherwise is like saying "I support an organization that works to save wolves! They raise a lot of awareness and get laws passed in favor of wolves, though members frequently like to go out with some rifles and shoot a bunch of wolves. I turn a blind eye to this abhorrent, pointless killing because I like how they do some good things for wolves! Yay!"
|
|
|
Post by dynastygal on Aug 16, 2009 19:25:59 GMT -5
The images put a face to what many seem to ignore. I've no doubt a lot of the euthanasia is abuse cases like shown in the photos...
Every organisation has it's good and bad points. But unless I see evidence of healthy animals being put down I can't really fault them for putting down abused animals who are at the point of no return.
|
|