|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jun 21, 2010 14:20:27 GMT -5
Discuss SeaWorld here.
|
|
|
Post by Black Dove on Jun 21, 2010 20:05:37 GMT -5
I find there to be no problem with SeaWorld. They treat those animals better than most humans are treated and they educate the public. Yes, I've heard rumors and blah blah blah. I went in November to the one in Orlando, and it was almost a moving experience. The trainers explained how they train and that it is all based on the rewards. There was a bond between animal and trainer that you could see clearly. So, I see nothing wrong with SeaWorld. They educate, conserve (there were manatees that they had rescued from the gulf there that would not be able to survive in the wild ), and are very good to the animals, as far as I can tell.
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jun 21, 2010 22:08:00 GMT -5
From an animal rights point of view, the animals they use for shows are still slaves, even if they are treated "right."
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jun 22, 2010 22:46:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dynastygal on Jun 23, 2010 11:31:10 GMT -5
Seaworld is just another excuse for using animals for entertainment. Whales, dolphins etc roam miles, not metres. Glass cages is all they are.
|
|
|
Post by Black Dove on Jun 23, 2010 12:00:40 GMT -5
I understand about the tanks being too small. I understand that that is cruel, and not natural. So, obviously I don't agree with that.
I don't believe SeaWorld is out for the money. Possibly with them having to build an amusement park with the animal-part, but truly, there are turtles, manatees, and penguins who were all injured in the wild. They would have never made it, had SeaWorld not taken them in and healed them. The ones who are still on site, I was told were unable to return to the wild, or were still healing. So, yes the enclosures are small, but they have good intentions. They need positive encouragement, and not all this nasty hate they're getting from some protests.
So, leave an injured animal in the wild to die, or save it, feed it, and eventually (if plausible) release it back into the wild?
|
|
|
Post by dynastygal on Jun 23, 2010 13:06:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Black Dove on Jun 24, 2010 15:42:53 GMT -5
^ Wow. Those articles are really eye-opening. I think I might be reconsidering...
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jul 3, 2010 3:29:29 GMT -5
I e-mailed them during PETA's virtual protest that PETA had a few weeks ago. This was their response:
Oh, and this was what I had said, in case anyone is wondering:
|
|
|
Post by dynastygal on Jul 3, 2010 9:15:52 GMT -5
Lol @ the response. The evidence suggests otherwise to their claims.
And research not being able to be done in the open ocean? What bull. Just observing them in their natural habitat is a form of research. As is dissecting any that end up beached and dying of natural causes. You don't need to cage an animal to learn about it. In fact, a caged animal will wield wrongful results as caged animals behave differently to their wild counterparts.
|
|
|
Post by Black Dove on Jul 3, 2010 14:57:15 GMT -5
Not to start anything, but dynastygal, how is the "evidence" any less propaganda than this response?? Their claims could be completely correct, and these other's claims could be the wrong, or vice versa.
I also don't believe in sending out mass emails to zoos and such, because all that is going to happen is they're going to get annoyed, and they won't do anything but send out these responses.
But anyway, dynastygal, you are correct about the quality of the results from the research they do on SeaWorld animals. There is a vast difference between wild and captive animals, and the way they live.
|
|
|
Post by dynastygal on Jul 3, 2010 17:02:31 GMT -5
The evidence is what is clearly seen at sea world, contrary to what they claim. Being able to see the place and the appalling conditions and treatment of the animals isn't propaganda in the slightest.
Anyone with half a clue about wild animals, especially wild marine animals could easily see sea world is not animal friendly.
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jul 6, 2010 1:14:26 GMT -5
If they get annoyed, they're going to want people to stop it. If they don't is when they may begin actually doing something. Of course, PETA's virtual protest was a one-time action on SeaWorld for most of the people (or at least that's what I am assuming.) It's better than doing nothing about it.
|
|
|
Post by AnimalAvenger on Jul 6, 2010 16:14:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Black Dove on Jul 9, 2010 10:13:15 GMT -5
I still don't understand why SeaWorld has to be entirely hated. It's not like they do all bad things. Yes, they do have poor quality conditions for some of their animals, but it is an experience with nature that most people would never experience because they're too lazy to go out and see the animals in their natural habitat. Like zoos, I believe SeaWorld has good intentions, and does not purposely abuse their animals, though they could do something about the tanks. Do you think if these animals were sad or upset they would do the shows? (And no, I do not believe in making animals do shows, but atleast they get their exercise and mental stimulation.) I don't think SeaWorld is to blame for Dawn Brancheau's death. In her line of work, their are always risks, and for some reason, Tilly was angered. Yes, it's possible it could have been the fact he may have not been exercised, or that he was stressed from his living conditions. It could have been the trainer's fault, or Tilly could've missed a feeding. But it also could've been a mental lapse or a sudden illness. Correct me if I'm wrong, but did they ever find out why the orca attacked her?? Was it really SeaWorld's fault, or was it just a freak accident that could have happened to anyone?
Oh, and good for SeaWorld. If I ran a place that I personally felt accomodated to animals' needs (which does not mean that they are right), I wouldn't want to be investigated by an organization that is known for putting reputations down the drain. Why does PETA have to be so aggressive in their actions? I thought it was an organization that educates the public. All PETA is doing is making SeaWorld angry, and not doing crap about telling them proper living environments for these animals.
So, yes, you can say I still support SeaWorld. I don't support their animal shows, but I support their research and education.
EDIT: ^^ I think the solution to these problems is for places like SeaWorld to quit breeding their animals, which will eventually mean they die out, and then extend their tanks and make them less hazardous to the animals they contain. I also think they should quit entirely with anything associated with dolphins and orcas, UNLESS they provide all records of what they do with the animals, the tank, and training, as well as records listing the size of the tank that compare what the dolphins/orcas would have normally in their natural habitat, all available to the public outside of each tank. They would have to be current, and show all the raw details, even if they are unappealing or potentially hazardous to the animals.
|
|